This is written as a response to an article in the Guardian 26/01/2010
Before the justice system gets all pompous about juries and their behaviour, it would be worth letting them see the world from the position of a jury member. The dingy waiting room, the food vouchers that don’t cover the cost of the food and of course god forbid you want fresh fruit. How about we make Judges and the barristers act as jurors as an exercise in seeing how the other half lives. But let’s be kind and only run it for two weeks no long cases for them.
Day one we start with queuing waiting to be searched. Sign in and wait. After a period someone will call names, it may be yours or it could be someone on the second week being called for a case. But you will be called. Now you get to see the video and a quick talk by someone who may have presentation skills but then again they may not, it’s the luck of the draw.
Now the waiting starts, the rest of the day some of your cohort will be called but let’s assume you don’t, you wait until 4pm then you are sent home. Next morning you come prepared you bring some work, book to read etc. but the search now takes longer and you get dirty looks from the security guards. Again you sign in and wait, did I say the room has the poor lighting and the chairs will have seen better days. You wait someone will call names, if you are lucky you will get a case, if not you will wait until 4pm, and be sent home. When I did mine I had 9 days of not being called then on my last day I drew a six week case!
So at last you are called, you are taken to a court and let’s assume you are sworn in and not send back to the waiting room (believe me you have seen more the enough of the waiting room). The judge warns you about talking to anyone about anyone the case, not to use the internet etc. Now you find you have a notepad and pencil if you are lucky to make notes. So you are ready to be a jury member but at this point and any number of times during the case you will be sent out of the court to the jury room while the judge and barristers discuss legal issues, this may be for ten minutes or two hours. But you will be bored, no books as you have left your bag in the court room.
Back to the court room, the barristers may be good. Sometimes you want to shout ask the bloody question and stop waffling. This of course is repeated day in and day out, a mixture of trying to follow the witnesses and being sent out
Again you take notes by the way you can’t take your notes out of the court room and write them up. Two days, or six weeks later this is all you have to go on. And no you can’t have a transcript of the case.
The case ends, the judge does their summary. Now you have a decision how much weight do you give the judges summary? Do you follow them blindly if so why have we spent x days trying to follow the case, on the other hand they have significantly more experience then you.
Back to the jury room where you debate the case, it can be quick or it can be a long time but your decision will affect the accused and others it’s not something you can take lightly. And now you find out how good or bad your note taking is as the twelve of you try to recall the ins and out of the case
Your time as a jury member is up; you will have been bored, paid too much for food and drink spent way too much time sat in the dingy jury waiting room